Brain Stains

Traumatic therapies can have long-lasting effects on mental health

TEXT SIZE: Decrease font Enlarge font

By Kelly Lambert and Scott O. Lilienfeld

 

HOLD ME: Sheri J. Storm's psychiatrist encouraged her to express her alternative personalities by writing and drawing while in a trancelike state. Drawn in 1995, this picture represented Storm's wish to comfort an inner child who had survived incest. The code stamped at upper right identifies the drawing as court evidence in Storm's still pending malpractice lawsuit.
Sheri J. Storm

A wave of nausea washed over Sheri J. Storm when she opened the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel on a February morning a decade ago and saw the headline: “Malpractice lawsuit: Plaintiff tells horror of memories. Woman emotionally testifies that psychiatrist planted false recollections.” The woman in the article shared a lot with Storm—the same psychiatrist, the same memories, the same diagnosis of multiple personality disorder. At that moment, Storm suddenly realized that her own illness and 200-plus personalities, though painfully real to her, were nothing more than a figment of her imagination—created by her trusted therapist, Kenneth Olson.

Storm initially sought treatment from Olson because of insomnia and anxiety associated with divorce proceedings and a new career in radio advertising. She had hoped for an antidepressant prescription or a few relaxation techniques. But after enduring hypnosis sessions, psychotropic medications and mental-ward hospitalizations, Storm had much more to worry about than stress. She had “remembered” being sexually abused by her father at the age of three and forced to engage in bestiality and satanic ritual abuse that included the slaughtering and consumption of human babies. According to her psychiatrist, these traumatic experiences had generated alternative personalities, or alters, within Storm’s mind.

Storm is now convinced that her multiple personality disorder was iatrogenic, the product of her “therapy.” But years after the psychiatric sessions have ceased, she is still tormented by vivid memories, nightmares and physical reactions to cues from her fictitious past. Although she was told that the false memories would fade over time, she has had a difficult time purging these “brain stains” from the fabric of her mind.

Storm’s case is similar to those of many other patients who ­underwent recovered-memory therapy that revealed sordid histories of sexual abuse and demonic ceremonies. Although the scientific literature suggests that traumatic events are rarely, if ever, repressed or forgotten, this type of therapy was widespread in the 1990s and is still practiced today. Only after several high-profile lawsuits did the American Medical Association issue warnings to patients about the unreliability of recovered memories. Nadean Cool, the patient described in the newspaper story that turned Storm’s life upside down, filed one such lawsuit. Cool received a $2.4-million settlement after 15 days of courtroom testimony. Amid the heated controversy, the American Psychiatric Association discontinued the diagnostic category of multiple personality disorder, replacing it with the slightly different diagnosis of dissociative identity disorder.

It seemed that science and the legal system had triumphed over sloppy therapeutic techniques. Some patients received substantial monetary settlements, their therapists were exposed in the media, and scientists produced convincing evidence that false memories could indeed be implanted in the human mind. Case closed. Or was it? For Storm and others like her, bad therapy seems to have altered the brain’s emotional circuitry, with lasting effects on memory and mental health. Fortunately, as with most other blemishes, such brain stains may be reversible, though only after considerable effort.

The Fallibility of Memory
In 1949 Canadian psychologist Donald O. Hebb proposed that cellular changes lead to the establishment of “memory circuits” in the brain. Neuroscientists Tim Bliss of the National Institute for Medical Research in London and Terje Lømo of the University of Oslo validated this idea in 1973 by demonstrating that electrical ­signals delivered to certain brain areas, such as the hippocampus, had long-lasting effects on the connections among nerve cells. Research over the past century has provided unequivocal evidence that the brain’s functional structures are continually modified to generate and maintain memories.

PAGE 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  | Next»

Discuss this Article

NOTE: You will be asked to sign in or register as a SciAm.com Community member upon submission of this article comment.
1000 characters remaining
5 Comments | VIEW ALL
  • "My experience: beeing a teenager, I was sent to a therapist by my mother: spurred to recall ugly memories of my childhood, I created a secund,...[More]"

    Posted 21 hours ago by piero.gamberini
  • "My experience: beeing a teenager, I was sent to a therapist by my mother: spurred to recall ugly memories of my childhood, I created a secund,...[More]"

    Posted 21 hours ago by piero.gamberini
  • "This is all incredibly frightening in and of itself. What is more disturbing is that the research listed here is a century old, forty years old and...[More]"

    Posted 1/20/08 by Mike Olson
  • "Is it possible to connect a digital memory device (e.g flash memory) to brain cells without performing neurosurgical operation,to save data from...[More]"

    Posted 11/26/07 by mathar
  • "Brain Stains"

    Posted 11/26/07 by admin

Subscription Center


© 1996-2008 Scientific American Inc. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.